EAR and civil engineering projects are heavily measured. Design models, surveying technology, ground monitoring, progress capture - the record runs every day, from groundbreak to handover. What is rarely in place is a standard way for the risk engineering team to read it. Pikt is engaged by the risk engineering team to connect what these projects already record, one project at a time, so the record reaches them time-stamped and source-attributed like any other Pikt connection.
A road scheme measures ground movement daily. A rail project logs every survey and every pour. The risk engineer sees a report when the programme allows one. The evidence exists. It rarely reaches the people carrying the risk.
On most construction sites the same reality capture and sensing platforms recur, so Pikt connects to them as standard.
EAR and Civil Engineering projects often record more, not less - surveying technology, ground monitoring, design and planning models, systems built for the job. But every stack is assembled for that project, so no ready-made connector exists. Reading it is consultative work. That work is Pikt Consulting.
Pikt Consulting works hand in hand with the lead insurer and their risk engineering team. The engagement answers one question: what can this project's technology be made to evidence?
With the risk engineering team and the project team, we map what the main contractor and their specialists are already running - capture, survey, monitoring, safety - whether off the shelf or built for the job. The risk engineering team decides which of it they want in the record.
Working with the project's own engineers, we bring the agreed sources up to the standard of every Pikt connection: time-stamped, source-attributed, and taken with the insured's explicit permission.
The project lands in Pikt like any other connected site. Risk engineers work from a continuous, evidenced record. Because the record runs without interruption, it answers what stood on site on any given date, including the day before a loss. Underwriters and loss adjusters read the same record.
If the project records itself, there is evidence worth having. Tell us what's running and we'll tell you what can be read.